Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Francis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 10, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 49. — ACTION BY SAMUEL FRANCIS AGAINST CATHERINE LILLY. — Appeal from Letcher Circuit Court. Theo. Lewis, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

*386Opinion of the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Affirming.

Judge H. C. Lilly purchased the tract of land involved in this controversy in the case of H. C. Lilly v. Kelly Hogg. A deed was executed by Judge Lilly by the court’s commissioner and a writ of possession awarded him. Kelly Hogg conveyed the land in the year 1881 to Tilda Whittaker. She conveyed to Amburgy, and the latter conveyed to Samuel Francis. Charging that he and his vendors obtained title to the land before the institution of the suit of Lilly v. Hogg, and that neither he nor his vendors were parties to that action,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terrell v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  2. Francis v. Lilly'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. McKee v. Stein's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Smith v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API