Legal Opinion

Gann v. Chevron Chemical Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 10, 1999No. 3:98-cv-00009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JARVIS, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Hobert E. Gann seeks compensatory and punitive damages for injuries which he claims he suffered because of defendant’s alleged discriminatory practices. Specifically, plaintiff contends that Chevron Chemical Company (Chevron) violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111, et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29-U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq., the Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA), Tennessee Code Annotated §§ 4-21-101, et seq., and the Tennessee Public Protection Act…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broadway v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API