Legal Opinion
Patrick v. Hardisty
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1984No. 83-1146PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Chief Judge:
In this case involving a complaint for possession of property, appellant John T. Patrick (Patrick) asserts that the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Walter Hardisty (Hardisty) was error because of genuine issues of material fact in dispute between the parties. In addition, appellant contends that the motion which formed the basis for the court’s ruling was untimely, see Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12-l(n), and likewise was precluded by the denial of an earlier motion, which it is urged, constituted the “law of the case.” 1 Appellee contends that even if all facts are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- International Underwriters, Inc. v. BoyleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Murphy v. Army Distaff Foundation, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sherman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wemhoff v. Investors Management Corp. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kurth v. DobrickyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Forgotson v. SheaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Leeks v. LeeksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.