Legal Opinion
Kurth v. Dobricky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1985No. 83-1046PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting a renewed motion for summary judgment in an action for unpaid rent, after another judge had denied such a motion. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting the renewed motion because the two motions were virtually identical, the amplified record in support of the second motion contained no meaningful new information, and there had been no intervening change in substantive law. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial.
I
Charles Kurth, the defendant-appellant, contracted with Weaver Bros, in the summer of 1981 to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Vessels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.