Legal Opinion

Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1988No. 86-08747, 85-15626, 86-01876, 86-08746; CA A46450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation case, EBI seeks review of a decision of the Board determining that claimant’s request for hearing was not untimely.

On August 19,1985, EBI issued a denial of responsibility for claimant’s aggravation claim. It sent the letter by certified mail, return receipt requested, to claimant’s correct address. Claimant did not claim the letter, despite notices left by the post office on August 21 and 27. On October 29, 1985, employer sent a copy of the notice of denial through the regular mail. Claimant received it on November 4,1985. He filed a request for hearing on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cowart v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giusti Wine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Giusti Wine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. United Foam Corp. v. WhiddonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API