Legal Opinion

Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1990No. 86-08747, 85-15626, 86-01876, 86-08746; CA A61582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*331RIGGS, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board after remand. In Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams, 94 Or App 175, 764 P2d 620 (1988), we remanded the case to the Board for a determination of whether claimant had “good cause” under ORS 656.319(1)(b) for failure to file a request for a hearing within the statutory period.1 The Board concluded that claimant had good cause, and employer assigns error to that holding. We affirm.

We recite the facts from our first opinion:

“On August 19,1985, [employer] issued a denial of responsibility for claimant’s aggravation claim. It sent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wright v. Bekins Moving and Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Hempel v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Matter of Compensation of CowartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Giusti Wine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Giusti Wine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. International Paper Co. v. CressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Morelock Wood Products v. BaurCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API