Legal Opinion

United Firemen's Ins. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 7, 1899No. 404PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKINS, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in our former opinion. 53 U. S. App. 517, 27 C. C. A. 42, and 82 Fed. 406. We granted a rehearing of the cause principally for a discussion of the question whether Prindiville, either as a matter of law or as a matter of fact, could be deemed the agent of the insurance company, appellant, in effecting the insurance in question. Aided by the oral arguments at such rehearing,' and in view of certain decisions of the supreme court of the state of Illinois, we have carefully considered the case, both with respect to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. American Fire Insurance v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Alkan v. New Hampshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Solomon v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hesselberg v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Morris McGraw Wooden Ware Co. v. German Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburg, Pa.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. Fredman v. Consolidated Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API