Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Roberts Numbering Machine Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis J. Capozzoli, J.

The complaint alleges two causes of action, the first for breach of contract and the second in fraud. Three defendants are named but the only one remaining as the sole defendant is the Roberts Numbering Machine Company, because the defendants Roberts Businesses, Inc., and Andrew CL Doukas did not appear.

In the first cause of action plaintiff alleges that a contract was entered into by him with Doukas, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of the two above-mentioned companies, whereby plaintiff agreed to transfer to the defendants capital stock in Universal Products Corporation, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Lynch v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. Arol Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API