Legal Opinion

In Matter of Partridge

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent’s clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent has filed a return opposing the petition.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Charles V. Verner, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re PearmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re PartridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re PearmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. In Re PartridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re PearmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API