Legal Opinion

In Re Pearman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent has been charged with soliciting prostitution, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-15-90 (2003), and impersonating a law enforcement officer, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. 16-17-720 (2003). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime., IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent'is suspended, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, from the practice of law in this State until further order of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Matter of PartridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Matter of PartridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API