Legal Opinion
Jose Ortiz-Sandoval v. Linda Clarke, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2003No. 02-15291PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Jose Ortiz-Sandoval (hereinafter “Sandoval”) appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 16, 1999. In his petition, Sandoval raises a Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on his trial counsel’s failure to object to a warrantless entry into his personal residence. In exhaustion proceedings, the Santa Clara County Superior Court denied the petition on the merits, holding that the warrantless entry was justified by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ambrose Gill v. Robert J. Ayers, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Guy Christopher BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Moore v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Moore v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.