Legal Opinion

United States v. 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix, VIN 1G2WJ14T5LF239678

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided April 22, 1992No. 2:91-CV-171Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PARKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, the United States, moves for summary judgment in its favor in this case, arguing it has met its burden of showing that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix (“the Vehicle”) is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4). Claimant Robert Mongeon, registered owner of the vehicle, responds that summary judgment should not be granted in the Government’s favor, since there is a factual dispute over whether the vehicle was used in connection with any drug transactions.

Summary judgment is to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Real Property & Building Known as 303 West 116th StreetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Elizabeth Aiello, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. 228 Acres Of Land And Dwelling Located On Whites Hill Road In Chester, Vt.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 15 Black Ledge Drive, Marlborough, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API