Braswell v. Garfield Cotton Oil Mill Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Swainsboro — Judge Mitchell. May 26, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
Braswell sued the Oil Mill Companjr for the loss of the services (services during minority) of his fifteen-year-old son, who was injured by having his hand caught in cogs, while attempting to oil a portion of the machinery in the defendant’s plant. It is alleged that the boy was employed with the permission of the father (who received the wages) for the sole purpose of sacking cottonseed hulls, which was not a dangerous employment, and was afterward, without the father’s consent, directed by the defendant’s foreman to oil the machinery. There are other allegations made for the purpose of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. Rome Machine & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Malone v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Amos v. Atlanta Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Farkas v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Collins v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Connell v. Fisher Body Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Haynie v. North Carolina Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Raines v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Woodstock Operating Corp. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
- Seglinski v. Baltimore Copper Smelting & Rolling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.