Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 24, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this pro se appeal by John F. Miller from denial of his petition for post conviction relief, he argues that the issue of merger of offenses previously raised and resolved by the Supreme Court in his direct appeal, State v. Miller, 108 N.J. 112, 527 A.2d 1362 (1987) was subsequently reinterpreted in State v. Dillihay, 127 N.J. 42, 601 A.2d 1149 (1992). He urges that his sentence must therefore be modified to merge his conviction under N.J.S.A 2C:24-4(a) for Endangering the Welfare of a Child with his conviction for Aggravated Sexual Assault, N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(a).

The motion judge concluded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. DillihaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. State v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. DillihayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HackettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API