Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Company v. Alcan Aluminum Holdings Limited

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1998No. 96 Civ. 3956 (LLS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

STANTON, District Judge.

The issue is whether there is a justiciable case or controversy.

So far as relevant here, this is an action for a declaratory judgment granting plaintiffs (“ARCO”) the right under section 7.3 of their Restructuring Agreement with the defendants (“Alcan”) to change ARCO’s production mix in a way which would increase its use of the hot mill capacity at the parties’ Logan, Kentucky plant, thus reducing the amount of hot mill hours available to Alcan.

Plaintiffs’ trial brief on that issue stated (May 22,1998 Pretrial Memo p. 7):

While ARCO Aluminum’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of MontrealDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Hertzog, Calamari & Gleason v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harbor Distributing Corp. v. GTE Operations Support Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  2. Berardi v. BerardiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API