New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Andrews
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, The New York and New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 30th day of October, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J. :
In this action the plaintiff sought to recover the amount agreed upon for supplying the defendant’s factory at Astoria, L. I., with the “ dry pipe system of automatic sprinklers, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the New York Board of Fire Underwriters.” The contract is evidenced by a proposal signed by the plaintiff and accepted by the' defendant. It was therein provided : “ The work and materials under this proposal to consist of furnishing and placing one cedar tank of sufficient capacity on top of a foundation to be erected by J. F. Andrews. Enough sprinklers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- New York & New Haven Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. AndrewsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ipp v. S. & W. BaumanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912