Legal Opinion
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Zalondek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 1911No. 298PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from. Corporation Commission. From an order of the 'Corporation Commission in favor of A. A. Zalondek and others and against the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company, the railroad company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On August 26, 1910, the appellees petitioned the Corporation Commission to require the appellant to construct a side track to the cotton gin of A. A. Zalondek, situated at South Cold Springs, and being located about one mile from the station or depot at Cold Springs; said gin also being off the right of way of the appellant a distance of forty or fifty feet. On the hearing on a former petition for the establishment of a depot the commission found as follows:
“It appears from the evidence adduced upon the hearing that citizens of Cold Springs and South Cold Springs are entitled to a better…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Missouri, K. v. Walker, Cty. Treas.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. Oklahoma Union Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.