Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Cave

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Jippeal from Christian Circuit Court. Baker vs. Ken-nett, 54 Mo., 532; 1 Pars. Conr., 240, 5 ed. ; id. 255; Cow. Treat., § 374; Southard vs. Porter, 43 N. H., 239 ; 13 Mass., 305 ; 3 Wend. 69. cited, Boeka vs. Nnella, 2S Mo., 180; Lewis vs. Bower. Adm’r, 29 Mo., 202; Schroeb. Dom. Rel., 535 ; 1 Pars. Bills and Notes, 254, § 2.

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge

This was a suit upon the following note:

“Aug. 6, 1870. One day after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of E. G. Williams, the sum of *440one hundred and seventy-five dollars and twenty-five cents, for value received of him, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, bearing' interest at the rate of ten per cent. 1

John T. Cave,

[Signed] Elizabeth Cave,

X>. M. Conn.”

The plaintiff (Patterson) bought this note of the payee (Williams) at or about the time of its date.

The defence was this: Cave was a minor, about nineteen years old, and he and Williams agreed to exchange…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boeka v. NuellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  2. Baker v. KennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Scotland County National Bank v. HohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Keokuk County State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Bishop v. ChaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API