Legal Opinion

The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interests of C.C.H., Minor Child, and Concerning N.C.H. and M.C.H.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice ROBERT A. AMUND-

[IT 1.] SON delivers the majority opinion of the Court on Issue 1, which reverses the trial court’s delinquency adjudication.

[¶ 2.] Acting Justice GORS delivers the majority on Issue 2, which reverses the trial court’s child in need of supervision adjudication.

[¶ 3.] C.C.H., a minor child, was adjudicated delinquent pursuant to SDCL Chapters 26-7A and 26-8C and a child in need of supervision as defined in SDCL Chapter 26-8B. C.C.H. appeals this disposition. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 4.] On February 13, 2001, in response to a teacher’s inquiry, C.C.H., an eighth grader in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Austad v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People Ex Rel. CchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Interest of I.T.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Interest of N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API