Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 22, 1914No. 1,057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Clarence Hale, Judge. Action by Robert D. Kinney against the Plymouth Rock Squab Company and others. From the judgment, plaintiff brings error. Affidavit of prejudice, filed by the plaintiff in error,

1Per curiam

The court, having fully considered the affidavit of prejudice filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, and the brief in support-thereof, is of the opinion that the statute under which the affidavit is filed, namely, section 21 of the Judicial Code of March 3, 1911, is so framed that evidently it does not apply to an appellate tribunal. Consequently the affidavit must be dismissed.

Ordered that the affidavit filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, entitled “An Affidavit of Prejudice under the Statute of March 3, 1911,” is dismissed, and the case will stand for trial in the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  3. Duke v. Committee on Grievances of the Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  4. George L. Ginger Et Ux. v. Avern Cohn, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ginger MacHine Products Corporation, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Re Harriet Bouslog, an Attorney at LawHawaii Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API