Arbuckle v. Turner
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Petitioners are confined in the Utah State Prison and seek habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (Supp. Pam.1967). State remedies have been exhausted.
These cases present the question of the extent to which Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) is retrospective in effect.
The necessity that a defendant’s guilty plea be voluntary and informed was a fundamental, constitutional principle prior to the Boykin decision. E. g., Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 493, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473 (1962)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ward v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- James G. Perry v. Sherman A. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- St. Clair v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
- Bracy v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Harold Wayne Arbuckle v. John W. Turner, Warden, Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.