Legal Opinion

Tucek v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Reilly, J.H.O.), dated May 16, 1988, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On June 1, 1982, the plaintiff entered into a contract with *589the defendants to purchase certain real property located in the Town of Orangetown for the sum of $50,000. The contract provided, in pertinent part:

"This contract is expressly subject to the purchaser obtaining at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Zev v. MermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Stawski v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. South Shore Skate Club, Inc. v. FatscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Regional Gravel Products, Inc. v. StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moray v. DBAG, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Citadel Equity Fund Ltd. v. Aquila, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Greenberg v. JoffeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Pyros v. DengelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Garnot v. LaDueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API