Carter v. Jablonsky

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Clarence Henry Carter appeals the district court’s decision to dismiss his case as a sanction for failing to obey scheduling and pretrial orders and failing to participate in scheduled pretrial conferences. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the procedural history of the case, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.

Rule 16(f) states, in pertinent part, “[i]f a party or party’s attorney fails to obey a *889scheduling or pretrial order, or if no appearance is made on behalf of a party at a scheduling or pretrial…