Legal Opinion
Ali v. Dainese USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 2021No. 1:19-cv-02422Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KALIMAH ALI, Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 2422 (KPF) -v.- AMENDED OPINION DAINESE USA, INC., ALBERTO RUBIO, AND ORDER and HECTOR HERNANDEZ, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: More than two weeks after fact discovery closed in this employment discrimination case, Plaintiff Kalimah Ali revealed that she had failed to disclose documents that she had repeatedly represented either were not in her possession or had previously been produced. These documents included: (i) text messages Plaintiff exchanged with third parties concerning…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Agiwal v. Mid Island Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.