Legal Opinion

Patton v. Williams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1984No. CA 84-160PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

James Jack Patton sued for damages for personal injuries caused by a motor vehicle accident with the appellee. At issue was which party ran a red light. The appellee intentionally injected the existence of insurance into this case, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

During direct examination, Patton testified that he felt obligated to pay his doctor’s bill. The appellee’s attorney immediately seized upon the word “obligated” and said:

Now, your Honor, he’s opening the door into his obligation to pay a bill that perhaps already has been paid. If he wants to open…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Pekin Stave & Manufacturing Co. v. RameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Amos v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Pickard v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Vermillion v. PetersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nazarenko v. CTI Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Younts v. Baldor Elec. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Hacker v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API