Patton v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
James Jack Patton sued for damages for personal injuries caused by a motor vehicle accident with the appellee. At issue was which party ran a red light. The appellee intentionally injected the existence of insurance into this case, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
During direct examination, Patton testified that he felt obligated to pay his doctor’s bill. The appellee’s attorney immediately seized upon the word “obligated” and said:
Now, your Honor, he’s opening the door into his obligation to pay a bill that perhaps already has been paid. If he wants to open…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holmes v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Pekin Stave & Manufacturing Co. v. RameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Amos v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Pickard v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Vermillion v. PetersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nazarenko v. CTI Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Younts v. Baldor Elec. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Hacker v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.