Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Hall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1988No. 88-110PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an automobile collision case in which the issue is whether counsel for Martha Hall, the appellee, made improper references to insurance coverage. We hold that he did and that a new trial should have been granted.

Martha Hall drove her car into the rear of a truck being driven by Keith E. Hacker who brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in the accident. Zetta Hacker, Keith’s wife, joined as a plaintiff seeking damages for loss of consortium. Martha Hall did not contest liability. The Hackers’ complaint sought $75,000 for permanent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. York v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Maurice E. Brown v. Patrick Lee RoyaltyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Warner v. LiebhaberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Pickard v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Trimble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Peters v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Milner v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Nelson v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API