Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Binzer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1936No. 15,143PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bridwell, J. —

Appellee was injured while riding as a guest of appellant in an automobile operated by him, and brought this action against appellant to recover damages because of said injuries. The complaint is in two paragraphs, each based on the theory that the conduct of appellant in the driving of said automobile in the manner he did drive it, and under the conditions existing at the time of the accident, was in reckless disregard of appellee’s rights. A demurrer, challenging the sufficiency of each paragraph of complaint on the ground that facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Indiana Railway Co. v. MaurerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Meeney v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Coconower v. StoddardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Inman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Beeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hunter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API