Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 19, 1961No. 4931PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
To the House of Representatives:
The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court make the following reply to your request for advice upon the following questions:
“1. Would any constitutional provisions be violated by restricting outdoor advertising as provided in House Bill No. 24 as amended?
“2. Without in any way limiting the generality of question No. 1, would the enactment of House Bill No. 24, as amended, for the purpose of securing funds offered by the United States, as disclosed in said Bill and amendment, violate any constitutional provisions?”
The criticism of the bill centers upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Paula-Beth Lashley Maher, Administratrix of the Succession of Morris G. Maher v. The City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- City of Santa Fe v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.