Legal Opinion

Porras v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided March 25, 1998No. 07-97-0208-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

Pending before the court is the State’s motion to dismiss this appeal. The latter was perfected by Victor Hugo Porras, appellant, who was released on bond pending appeal. According to the motion and affidavit attached thereto, appellant has disappeared. Furthermore, his bond was surrendered on October 27, 1997, and the court issued a warrant for his arrest on that day. Thus, the State argues that dismissal is appropriate under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.4. We agree.

According to Rule 42.4, an appellate court “must dismiss an appeal on the State’s motion, supported by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Luciano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Pfeffer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  5. Prince v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ike v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Jackie Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. State v. RAIBURNSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Pedro Cruz, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  5. Trent Archie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API