Legal Opinion
Seidman v. American Mobile Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 92-1782PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
This is a consolidated action brought by disappointed investors under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule lob-5, as adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to the Exchange Act. Presently before the Court is plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification (Docket No. 42). Frank and Kathleen Seidman (the “Seidmans”) claim that they suffered economic damages when they purchased 1,000 shares of the common stock of defendant American Mobile Systems, Inc.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Zarrella v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Perry v. Fleetboston Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- DeCesare v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.