Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Department of Health

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2008No. 20070197Published

1Opinion of the Court

206 P.3d 287 (2009)

2008 UT 86

Paul HOUGHTON and Billie Henderson, individually and each as representative of a class; and Damian Henderson, Wayne Rubens, Ron Roes, and Susan Roes, who are other members of these classes, similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; The Office of Recovery Services; The Department of Human Services; The State of Utah; Rod L. Betit, Director of the Department of Health and Director of Department of Human Services; Emma Chacone, Executive Director of the Office of Recovery Services; and John Does 1-50 and Jane Does 1-50, Defendants and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Laub v. SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Richardson v. Arizona Fuels Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. HammettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API