Legal Opinion

Bank of Northampton v. Town of Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Two parties claim the fund remaining in the hands of the town of Jackson after the completion of the contract for the installation of a water and sewerage system. One of those parties is the plaintiff Bank of Northampton, claiming by virtue of an assignment to it by the contractor of sums due and to become due under the contract, as security for a loan for the purpose of carrying out the contract, • made after notice to and with express consent of the town. The other party is the defendant Casualty Company, which claims by virtue of an agreement by the contractor to assign sums to become due…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Page Trust Co. v. Carolina Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Chemical Co. v. McNair.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Wike v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Hurst v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Settlement Funding, LLC v. Jamestown Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999
  5. Alamance Lumber Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API