Legal Opinion

Hargreaves v. Hargreaves

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1960No. 35146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Quaere: May a nonresident plaintiff secure a divorce in the state of Washington, where the resident defendant appears and asks for a divorce on a cross-complaint?

Answer: No. Under our statute the courts of this state have no jurisdiction in a divorce action not commenced by a resident of the state. (An analysis of the statute and the cases appears in another portion of this opinion.)

Circumstances Which Raise the Question: The plaintiff, a nonresident of the state of Washington (apparently a resident of the Province of British Columbia where divorces are more difficult to come by), brought an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ferry v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mapes v. MapesWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wampler v. WamplerWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sterl v. SterlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Tupper v. TupperWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API