Legal Opinion

Bienstock v. Nista Construction Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The plaintiff and defendant own adjoining lots on the west side of Decatur avenue, New York city. Neither lot faces any other street. On the plaintiff’s land is erected a brick dwelling of two or three stories in height which is a permanent structure used as plaintiff’s residence. The house is so erected that one portion of it runs within six inches of defendant’s line. The grade of the plaintiff’s land was approximately six feet above the established grade of the street. Defendant in order to construct an apartment house on its lot excavated its land to approximately the street grade. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Leerburger v. . Hennessey Realty CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Gillies v. EckersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bienstock v. Nista Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Iguera v. BenzNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Parrinello v. HicksAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API