Iguera v. Benz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtF. E. Johnson, J.
The plaintiffs in this action are the adjoining owners of property on Kessel street and the defendants are the adjoining owners of property on the rear street so that the rears of the lots on both streets abut. The legal level of Kessel street is substantially lower than the legal level of Loubet street. The land of the higher lots on Ifoubet street is at the rear substantially higher than the rear of the properties on Kessel street and the wall retaining the defendants’ land is obviously necessary. The one there having decayed and a new one being imperatively required for conditions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bergen v. Morton Amusement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Riley v. Continuous Rail Joint Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Leerburger v. . Hennessey Realty CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bienstock v. Nista Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930