Legal Opinion
Patrick H. King v. Ac & R Advertising Saatchi & Saatchi Company Plc Alvin Chereskin Harry J. Koenig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1995No. 94-55327PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Patrick King sued defendants AC & R Advertising, Inc. (“AC & R”), Alvin Cheres-kin, and Harry Koenig, for wrongful termination and age discrimination under California state laws. The district court dismissed King’s claim against Chereskin and Koenig (as individuals) for age discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and granted the defendants summary judgment on King’s breach of contract, age discrimination in employment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
K…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- David K. Huskey v. City of San Jose Joan Gallo George Rios Ralph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mary Christine Smith v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.