Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Hyundai Motor Financing Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2005No. C2-04-720Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants, Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Finance Company. Plaintiff, Vicki D. Jenkins, 1 opposes the Motion of Defendant Hyundai Motor Finance Company. 2 For the reasons that follow, the Motion of Defendant Hyundai Motor America is granted. The Motion of Defendant Hyundai Motor Finance Company is granted in part and denied in part.

I

The following well-pleaded allegations are taken from the Complaint and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API