People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and a new trial is granted on counts three, four, five, seven and nine of the indictment in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court’s submission of a verdict sheet *983containing the elements of the three charges of burglary in the second degree over defense counsel’s objection constitutes reversible error (see, People v Mikel, 237 AD2d 982 [decided herewith]; People v Richardson, 234 AD2d 952; see also, People v Damiano, 87 NY2d 477). Thus, defendant’s conviction of two of those charges under counts three and four…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GuidiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Williams v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.