Legal Opinion

Berkheimer v. Hewlett-Packard Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 29, 2022No. 1:12-cv-09023Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STEVEN E. BERKHEIMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 12 C 9023 v. ) ) Judge John Z. Lee HP INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Steven Berkheimer has sued Defendant HP, Inc., under

35 U.S.C. § 1

et seq., alleging infringement of

U.S. Patent No. 7,447,713

(“the ’713 Patent”). The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, HP’s motion is granted, and Berkheimer’s motion is denied. I. Background1 The Court presumes familiarity with the factual background of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Commil United States, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API