Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Salt Lake City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1995No. 940145PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Don Nixon appeals from a post-verdict judgment of the Third District Court denying him any recovery in his personal-injury action brought against Salt Lake City Corporation (“SLC”). At the conclusion of the trial, the jury apportioned the relative fault for Nixon’s injuries as follows: Nixon, 42%; defendant SLC, 29%; and Calhoun Maintenance of Utah, Inc. (“Calhoun”), Nixon’s employer, 29%. Nixon’s employer was on the special verdict form only for the purpose of apportioning fault for the injury, as it was immune from suit under section 35-1-60 of the Utah…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. General Electric Co. v. NiemetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Cache County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lieber v. ITT Hartford Insurance Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API