Schulman v. Royal Industrial Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order modified insofar as to deny dismissal of the first cause of action. It is not clear from the complaint alone that some enduring obligation through the years was being undertaken by defendants and that the transaction or transactions contemplated could not be completed within the year. The impression gained from the complaint is that the parties were contracting in reference to an immediate and particular corporate need and some financial dealing to that point, rather than in reference to continuing transactions which might take place over a period of years, as in Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- United Chemical & Exterminating Co. v. Security Exterminating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roberts v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Schulman v. Royal Industrial BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953