Legal Opinion

Schulman v. Royal Industrial Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1953Published

1Per curiam

The order appealed from should be modified so as to strike out under rules 102 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice paragraph “ Fifth ” of the complaint as alleged and also as realleged in paragraph “ Twelfth ” as not necessary to the cause of action alleged (Schulman v. Royal Ind. Bank, 279 App. Div. 1008), and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, with costs to appellants. When the case was considered on appeal in Schulman v. Royal Ind. Bank (281 App. Div. 674) it was solely on a motion to dismiss under rules 112 and 113 and there was no motion before the courts under rules…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schulman v. Royal Industrial BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Schulman v. Royal Industrial BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API