Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Booth Fisheries Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 20, 1944PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:

As to all of the disputed claims, questions are raised whether the claimants complied with the statutory requirement of making a written objectian to the merger. The corporation received letters purporting to be written on behalf of certain shareholders, but signed by one Edgar J. Bernheimer. The letters state objections to the merger. The only evidence of any authority in Bernheimer to make the objections on behalf of the shareholders was his own representation and assumption to act. Under such circumstances, objections by an agent are insufficient. In re Universal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Commonwealth & Southern Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  2. In re the Appraisal of Shares of Common Stock of Universal Pictures Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  3. Stephenson v. Commonwealth & Southern Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. Doeller v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Schenck v. Salt Dome Oil Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Zeeb v. Atlas Powder Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Lewis v. Corroon Reynolds CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  5. Jaquith & Co. v. Island Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API