Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James G. Moldenhauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2016No. 2015AP001966-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review a stipulation filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney James G. Moldenhauer. In the stipulation, Attorney Moldenhauer agrees that he engaged in two counts of misconduct involving his clients, G.C. (now deceased), and G.C.'s wife, L.C. (collectively, the C.s.). Attorney Moldenhauer also agrees that a 60-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. The OLR does not request restitution, and it also does not seek the imposition of costs against Attorney…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auseth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ListerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against TheobaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ErmertWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hudec (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Patrick J. Hudec)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Crystal L. SaltzwadelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Fulkerson (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Holly Lynn Fulkerson)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018