Legal Opinion
Fields v. Queen Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 27, 1924No. 14242PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action upon fire-insurance policy; from city court of Oglethorpe —Judge Greer. September 27, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. It is necessary to a recovery by an insured under a fire-insurance policy that he show a compliance with the terms and conditions of the policy, including the so-called “iron-safe clause.” Jefferson Fire Ins. Co. v. Brackin, 147 Ga. 47 (92 S. E. 930). Where the policy, which is upon a stock of merchandise and store furniture and fixtures, etc., provides that if the insured has not within 12 calendar months prior to the date of the policy, or “within 30 days of the issuance of this policy,”'taken a complete itemized inventory of the stock on hand, the policy shall be null and void, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Finleyson Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Jefferson Fire Insurance v. BrackinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Coppi v. West American InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- National-Ben Franklin Fire Ins. v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Jenkins v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Firemen's Insurance Co. v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941