Legal Opinion

Firemen's Insurance Co. v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1941No. 29042Published

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. The court erred in charging the jury as follows: “The court charges you the principal shall be bound by all the acts of his agent within the scope of his authority; the principal may not ratify in part and repudiate in part; he shall adopt either the whole or none. The court charges you that a ratification by the principal shall relate back to the act ratified, and shall take effect as if originally authorized. A ratification may be express, or implied from the acts or silence of the principal. A ratification once made may not be revoked.” There was no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Hughes Bros. v. Ætna Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Everett-Ridley-Ragan Co. v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API