Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farish v. Courion Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1985No. Nos. 82-1964, 83-2203Published

1Dissent

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit

Judge, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

Our most trustworthy guides to what the Supreme Court of Virginia would probably hold on the applicability of this 1962 antiprivity statute are the plain meaning canon of statutory construction and the most directly relevant judicial precedents to be found in decisions of that court. Looking to those sources, I am persuaded that the state court would most likely hold that the anti-privity statute was intended by the legislature to apply, and therefore did apply, to these two cases. I would accordingly now hold that it did…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API