Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 4, 1947No. 4293PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

71 F.Supp. 29 (1947)

EDMUNDS

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 4293.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

April 4, 1947.

Homer Hall, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Wm. B. Waldo and Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Harry C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Sikeston, Mo., and Rosemary M. Ramsey, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

HULEN, District Judge.

The question here presented is whether $8,999.51 (resulting in a tax of $3,270.97), admittedly expended for legal services by plaintiff, is deductible from her gross income for the year 1941, under Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Helvering v. StormfeltzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Davis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Steedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Steedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Coke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. Estate of Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Coke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API