Legal Opinion

Steedman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 28, 1927No. E-563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This case involves a claim for refund of estate taxes voluntarily paid, upon the ground that there was erroneously included in decedent’s tax return as a part of her gross estate, certain real estate located in the State of Missouri owned by her at the time of her death, for the alleged reason that under the statute of that State real estate could not be sold for the payment of expenses of administration and should, therefore, have been excluded from the gross estate under the terms of the taxing statute. Thus in effect plaintiffs are claiming an exemption by reason of the alleged failure of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Howell v. JumpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Guettel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Estate of Poe v. PoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Edmunds v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947
  5. Crooks v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API