Legal Opinion
Minor v. Shifflett
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 14, 1969No. [No. 7, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Barnes, J., concurred in the result and filed a concurring opinion. (See p. 168, infra.)
Appellees (Shifflett) have operated an automobile junk yard at their present location in the extreme western section of Baltimore County since about 1932. The zone in which they are located is an R-40 zone. Their use has been a nonconforming use since the adoption of zoning in Baltimore County in 1945.
Shifflett is no stranger to this Court. See Shifflett v. Baltimore County, 247 Md. 151, 230 A. 2d 310 (1967) wherein we upheld the validity of the Baltimore County ordinance adopted in 1962 requiring the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Hewitt v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Offutt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Huff v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Temmink v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wells v. PierpontCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Surkovich v. DoubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Cabin John Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hardesty v. DunphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Mraz v. COUNTY COMM'RS OF CECIL CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.